When it comes to the argument over abortion, I’ll admit, I struggle to find the certainty in arguing for either side that I do in many other issues. It still, however, remains a very divisive issue.
Social conservatives make, in my view, a reasonable argument for restricting abortion. They deem the unborn fetus as having rights that we all possess: including the right to life. I struggle to justify this when taking into account the empirical ramifications of abortion restrictions, which is why we should be open to other policies that may satisfy both the worries of the social conservative, the claim to a right to one’s body of the pro-choice advocate, and the consequences of both claims.
Why, then, don’t we permit women to purchase contraceptives over the counter? It seems to side-step the worries of the social conservative about violations of rights. It poses no consequence, in my view, to the rights of anyone (and ought to be within the right of the individual anyways). This would prevent unwanted pregnancies in the first place, lowering the necessity for abortion.
I should clarify: I am not calling for the taxpayer funding of contraceptive access. A woman chooses to have sex, she must bear the cost of her actions; nor should anyone who opposes contraceptives have to fund them. Access to contraceptives seems to me a practical solution to a divisive problem, yet social conservatives maintain their worries.